For fintech companies

Use your data with AI. Keep every access rule you answer for.

Inside Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot, Gemini and every agent on the market. No new tool.

Reads Salesforce, HubSpot, Gong, Slack and 9 more

The problem

Your data is everywhere, and every AI tool is a new access risk.

Risk

Customers told a different story by each team

Time

Staff time burned proving who can see what

Cost

Paying for AI that cannot touch the work

By the numbers

The problem, in numbers

$6.29M

average breach cost in financial services

Source: IBM

43%

of breaches involve shadow AI

Source: IBM

44%

say fragmented data blocks automation

Source: SAPinsider

92%

of firms with an AI incident lacked AI access controls

Source: IBM

With Mithrandir

Before: Hours, weeks, months

With Mithrandir: Seconds

Up to 396 to 792 hours a year saved per person

Up to $36K to $71K

more revenue a year, per person

Source: McKinsey; Coveo; Axios · How it is estimated

Make your AI better

8.3×
lower AI cost
2.2×
faster answers
0
leaks in 30,000+ entries

How we measure

How much better it gets

In the agent each person already uses, within what they can access.

  1. Time

    Answering an access audit

    Before

    Days of exports, stale before they are sent.

    After

    Who could see what is the same rule behind every answer.

  2. Risk

    A regulator asks how something changed

    Before

    The history is spread across meetings and people who left.

    After

    The full history, in order, with a source for each step.

  3. Revenue

    Sales and support on the same customer

    Before

    Sales promises one thing, support reads another.

    After

    One company memory, each person within their own rights.

  4. Cost

    A new risk or compliance hire

    Before

    A first month spent asking how things got this way.

    After

    The full history of the current setup, from day one.

  5. Risk

    AI that finally knows the company

    Before

    Customer details pasted into AI chats by hand.

    After

    Claude, ChatGPT, Copilot or Gemini, inside your access rules.

Safe on every row.

Only what you can already access

Your hierarchy, the way it should be

Walls that hold, for every agent

0 leaks, 100% sourced, 30,000+ entries. How we measure · Security

A scenario

One Monday morning in fintech

An auditor's request lands at 8:30: show who could see a merchant's dispute files last quarter, and how the refund policy changed. The head of compliance asks Claude.

“Who could see this merchant's dispute files last quarter, and what changed in our refund policy?”

The head of compliance · in Claude

The policy change with the thread where it was approved, the ticket that rolled it out, and the access history for the files, each with its source.

A support agent · in Copilot

The current refund policy and the tickets in their own queue. Approval threads and other teams' cases stay out of reach, exactly as they do at work.

The auditor gets a sourced answer the same morning. Nobody exported a spreadsheet, and nobody saw more than their job allows.

21% of CISOs govern AI agent access with shared credentials. Source: Okta, Global CISO Insights 2026

Questions

Can it help answer an access audit?
It shows who could see what, and how a policy changed, with the source for each step. Each person asking sees only what they can access at work.
Does customer data stay in our cloud?
Yes. Mithrandir runs in your own cloud with your own model key. Restricted content never reaches a model.
Will sales, support and risk see the same customer?
Each team sees the same customer history within its own access, so nobody tells a customer a different story and nobody sees more than their role allows.

See it on your own data.

Connect CRM, chat and docs. Ask what your auditors ask. Compare two people's answers.

Remember.

Every company needs agents that know it. We are here for that.

Remember more. Spend less.

Bring one workflow. See it on your own data in 30 minutes.

Last updated 21 October 2026 · Mert Uzun, co-founder