For hardware companies
Every build, every supplier, every lesson. In the agents your team already uses.
Design reviews, suppliers, tests and ERP. One memory.
Reads SAP and ERP systems, Jira, Linear, GitHub and 10 more
The problem
Every revision teaches something. Most of it is gone by the next one.
Cost
Paying for the same failure on every revision
Risk
Supplier terms one resignation away from gone
Time
Time lost reconciling design, orders and builds
By the numbers
The problem, in numbers
- 48%
of engineers search 1+ hour a day for parts
Source: Partsolutions
- 83%
of engineers recreate parts that already exist
Source: Partsolutions
- 1.8 to 3.6 hours
a day lost searching for information
Source: McKinsey; Coveo
- ~1.9M
US manufacturing jobs could go unfilled by 2033
Source: Deloitte
With Mithrandir
Before: Hours, weeks, months
With Mithrandir: Seconds
Up to 396 to 792 hours a year saved per person
Up to $12K to $24K
more revenue a year, per person
Source: McKinsey; Coveo; Damodaran · How it is estimated
How much better it gets
In the agent each person already uses, within what they can access.
Cost
A failure that happened before
Before
The same failure is remembered after the rework is paid.
After
The earlier case, the fix and the test that proved it.
Time
Changing a part
Before
Nobody knows where the part came from, so the change waits.
After
The review, the alternatives and the supplier threads behind it.
Cost
Supplier history
Before
A buyer leaves and the supplier history goes too.
After
The full supplier history from email, calls and the ERP.
Risk
Engineering and operations on one page
Before
Manufacturing learns of design changes from the build.
After
Design changes, orders and builds, together.
Time
A new engineer on a program
Before
Months of decks and drives before real work starts.
After
How the program got here, revision by revision.
Safe on every row.
Only what you can already access
Your hierarchy, the way it should be
Walls that hold, for every agent
0 leaks, 100% sourced, 30,000+ entries. How we measure · Security
A scenario
One Monday morning in hardware
At 7:50 a test rig flags a connector failure on the new revision. The build review is at 10:00, and the VP of engineering asks Claude first.
“Have we seen this connector fail before, and what did we change?”
The VP of engineering · in Claude
The same failure two revisions ago, its root cause, the supplier who changed the plating, and the cost terms agreed with them, each with its source.
A new test engineer · in Copilot
The failure report, the root cause and the design change that fixed it. Supplier pricing stays with procurement and leadership.
The fix from two revisions ago goes into the build review. Nobody repeats the investigation, and the supplier terms stay with the people who own them.
95% of enterprise generative AI pilots show no measurable return. Source: MIT NANDA, The GenAI Divide, July 2025
Questions
- Can it find a failure we already solved?
- Yes. Ask in your agent and the past failure comes back with its root cause, the change that fixed it and the sources.
- Are supplier terms kept private?
- Each person sees only what they can access at work. Supplier pricing stays with the people your company has cleared for it.
- Does it read ERP and engineering tools together?
- Yes. ERP, tickets, drives, chat and email go into one memory, so design, orders and builds sit on one page.
See it on your own data.
One program: drives, tickets, email and ERP. Ask what your engineers ask.
Remember.
Every company needs agents that know it. We are here for that.
Remember more. Spend less.Bring one workflow. See it on your own data in 30 minutes.
Last updated 21 October 2026 · Mert Uzun, co-founder